Skip to main content

OT/ICS Cybersecurity

Demystifying OT Inventory vs. OT Asset Visibility: Understanding Key Differences and Uses

This is my final blog of the year, and in hindsight, it's probably the one I should have kicked off the year with. Better late than never, right? At the very least, we'll be well-prepared for 2025. Terms like OT/ICS Inventory and OT/ICS Asset Visibility are often used interchangeably, but are they truly the same? Do they cover the same assets? Who uses which? This blog aims to clear up any confusion about these two concepts.

 

Technical Overview 

OT Inventory and OT Asset Visibility are related but distinctly different concepts within the realm of maintaining and securing operational technology (OT). Here's how they differ: 

OT Inventory

OT Asset Visibility

Overview:

An OT inventory is a comprehensive, documented list of all operational technology assets within an organization. This includes detailed information about each asset, such as hardware, software, firmware, components and their configurations.  

Overview:

OT asset visibility refers to the awareness and understanding of all Industrial Control System (ICS) assets within an organization. This involves continuously monitoring and tracking the status, performance and security posture of these assets. 

Purpose: 

  • To provide a complete, static record of all OT assets. 

  • To support asset management, maintenance and lifecycle activities. 

  • To ensure compliance with regulations and standards. 

  • To aid in planning and resource allocation. 

Purpose: 

  • To provide ongoing, dynamic insights into the OT environment. 

  • To enhance security monitoring and incident response capabilities. 

  • To support proactive maintenance and operational efficiency. 

  • To enable detection and remediation of issues. 

Key Characteristics: 

  • Detailed Documentation: Contains extensive information about each asset, including serial numbers, versions, configurations, locations and dependencies. 

  • Static Nature: Generally updated periodically to reflect changes in the OT environment. 

  • Structured Format: Typically maintained in a structured format, such as a database or report, for ease of access and management. 

Key Characteristics: 

  • Monitoring: Utilizes tools and technologies to continuously monitor OT assets and their changes. 

  • Dynamic Insights: Offers current information about the status, performance and security of assets. 

  • Integration with Security and Management Systems: Often integrates with other systems (e.g., SIEM, SOC) to provide comprehensive visibility. 

  

Summary of Differences 

Aspect 

OT Inventory 

OT Asset Visibility 

Definition 

Comprehensive list of OT assets 

Awareness of OT assets 

Nature 

Static, periodically updated 

Dynamic, continuously monitored 

Purpose 

Documentation, compliance, planning 

Security, operational efficiency, incident response 

Information Included 

Detailed asset information (hardware, software, configurations) 

Current status, performance, security posture 

Tools Used 

Databases 

Monitoring systems 

Updates 

Periodically  

Continuously 

Examples 

Asset databases, inventory reports 

Dashboards, monitoring alerts 

 

In summary, while an OT inventory provides a detailed, static record of all OT assets, OT asset visibility offers dynamic, continues insights into the status and security of these assets. Both are essential for effective OT management, but they serve different purposes and utilize different methods to achieve their goals. 

 

OT Asset Coverage 

Now that we grasp the technical differentiation, one clear commonality between these topics is their shared support of OT assets. So, what exactly constitutes an OT asset? OT assets are essential endpoints along with their associated components that are used to monitor and control industrial processes. Here are typical examples of OT assets deployed across various industries: 

  • Control Valves and Actuators: Devices used to control fluid flow and pressure within industrial processes. 

  • Data Historians: Software systems used to store, retrieve and analyze historical data from industrial processes. 

  • Distributed Control Systems (DCS): Systems used to control manufacturing processes within a single facility or plant. 

  • Human-Machine Interfaces (HMIs): Interfaces that allow human operators to interact with control systems visually and interactively. 

  • Industrial Networking Equipment: Switches, routers, firewalls and gateways designed to support robust and secure communication within industrial environments

  • Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs): Specialized computers designed to automate control processes within manufacturing and industrial environments. 

  • Remote Terminal Units (RTUs): Devices used to monitor and control field devices and transmit data to a central control system. 
  • Sensors and Actuators: Devices that detect changes in physical variables (e.g., temperature, pressure, flow) and initiate control actions. 
  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems: Centralized systems used to monitor and control processes across large geographic areas. 

 

Users  

An important question arises about who uses these technologies. Since both technologies cover the same assets, there's naturally some overlap among their users. However, despite the shared assets, each function offers distinct capabilities, suggesting that their users are also distinctly different. Essentially, while both functions serve overlapping user roles supporting the assets, their unique capabilities mean their user bases vary based on their specific roles. 

The users of OT Inventory typically include: 

  • Operations and Maintenance Teams - Use OT inventory to track asset locations, configurations and maintenance activities. 

  • IT and OT Security Teams - Use OT inventory to identify and manage security risks associated with OT assets. 

  • Compliance and Audit Teams - Use OT inventory to demonstrate compliance by documenting asset details and configurations. 

  • Asset and Inventory Managers - Use OT inventory to manage asset lifecycle information. 

  • Engineering and Control System Teams - Use OT inventory to understand asset dependencies and interactions within the control system. 

  • Executives and Decision-Makers - Use OT inventory to assess the health and efficiency of OT operations. 

  • Service Providers and Vendors - Use OT inventory to understand client environments and deliver tailored services. 

 The users of OT Asset Visibility typically include: 

  • Operations Teams - Use OT asset visibility to ensure smooth operation of industrial processes and systems. 

  • Security Teams - Use OT asset visibility to implement measures to protect critical infrastructure and data. 

  • Maintenance Teams - Use OT asset visibility to minimize downtime and optimize asset performance. 

  • Compliance Teams - Use OT asset visibility data for audits and reporting purposes. 

  • Executive Management - Use OT asset visibility to allocate resources effectively and prioritize investments in OT security and efficiency. 

  • IT Teams - Use OT asset visibility to manage cybersecurity measures and policies affecting OT environments. 

  • Third-party Service Providers - Use OT asset visibility to assist organizations in optimizing their OT asset management practices.

 

Conclusion 

Understanding the nuances between OT Inventory and OT Asset Visibility helps organizations optimize their operational technology management strategies. Both are indispensable for maintaining secure, efficient industrial processes, each serving distinct but complementary roles in the modern industrial landscape. 

About the Author

Nick Cappi is Vice President, Portfolio Strategy and Enablement for OT Cybersecurity in Hexagon Asset Lifecyle Intelligence division. Nick joined PAS in 1995, which was acquired by Hexagon in 2020. In his role, Nick oversees commercial success of the business, formulates and prioritizes the strategic themes, and works with product owners to set strategic product direction. During his tenure at PAS, Nick has held a variety of positions including Vice President of Product Management and Technical Support, Director of Technical Consulting, Director of Technology, Managing Director for Asia Pacific Region, and Director of Product Management. Nick brings over 26 years of industrial control system and cybersecurity experience within the processing industries.

Profile Photo of Nick Cappi